Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Tyra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes  talk 02:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Tyra[edit]

Emily Tyra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very sketchy evidence for notability. She has never had a major role in a major production. The closest is one of the secondary characters in Code Black. Everything else is either a minor role, or a regional theatre production, or a junior company, or an understudy.

The talk page shows the previous discussion of the draft.

The NYT article just lists her in the legend to a photo of the principal performer,; The CBS articles is just a cast list, a listing in playbilll is again a cast list; the film reviewed in Variety is a very minor film, and nothing else is remotely usable for notability DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep With all due respect to the contributor's assessments as above, the criteria mentioned above as reason for deletion (no major role in a major production) is subject to an individuals' personal definition of Major. Further, a discussion of her notability relative to established Wikipedia criteria for an actor - and her affirmative suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia - has already been developed and presented in the talk section of the article. This article has had >12k pageviews since inclusion in Wikipedia in May 2020. Such a high level of pageview activity is inconsistent with the assertion that Tyra is not notable by Wikipedia users. Best, PackardTwin8 (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 22:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:NACTOR says an actress is notable if they have had significant roles in multiple notable productions. She was a main cast member on Code Black and starred in Harpoon (2019 film). There is also significant coverage of her performance in Chorus Line in The Washington Post [1] and Playbill [2]. I believe these allow her to fulfil NACTOR C1. Z1720 (talk) 23:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep coverage in outlets mentioned above read as notability to me Balle010 (talk) 01:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - she has had major roles in touring companies and small roles on Broadway, and the breakout role on Code Black. Bearian (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.