Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Shard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created as a normal editing action. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Shard[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is virtually no coverage in reliable sources. The Guardian article cited in the first paragraph does not even mention her. I do not see how this passes WP:BASIC notability criteria. Surtsicna (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 09:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "The Guardian article cited in the first paragraph does not even mention her.": it does. There's a list of those disqualified from the line of succession, including "41 David Lascelles, Viscount Lascelles (b 1950). David's two eldest children, Honourable Emily Lascelles (b 1975) and Honourable Benjamin Lascelles (b 1978), were born before their parents' marriage ". Different surname, same Emily. PamD 10:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right! Thanks. Surtsicna (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral on deletion, but if deleted then Redirect to father's article. PamD 10:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment thanks PamD her only claim to notability is that shes part of the aristocracy Devokewater @ 14:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which would be fine if the media paid enough attention to her, right? I hardly see any references to her, however. Surtsicna (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable member of an aritocratic family.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete did a quick Google search. Seems unlikely any sources sufficient to establish notability exist. Per the references in the article itself, WP:GNG is clearly not met. Hmanburg (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.