Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Koski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minneapolis City Council. ♠PMC(talk) 06:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Koski[edit]

Emily Koski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

City council member. Her father was mayor, but that's not her. No reason for notability. Mvqr (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 18:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 18:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 18:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 18:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The endorsement from the local daily newspaper notes her opposition to defunding the police and imposing rent controls. This makes civic unrest more likely, as well as more headlines about Minneapolis in national and world media. Also relevant: "'The eyes of the country will be on Minneapolis' | Political analyst predicts significant shift in city council after election". kare11.com. November 1, 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-10. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 19:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This strikes me as speculative. If there is future civil unrest in Minneapolis and if she becomes notable due to that civil unrest, then she should have an article, but as of now, she is not notable in my view. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 20:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.