Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Jewell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Jewell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress of questionable notability. All her TV appearance seem to be 1 or 2 time shots while her single film role is just one role. Upon looking up Emily Jewell (actress) I am not getting many results either (I had to do actress as I got a different person when I did just her name) Wgolf (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Multiple stage, TV and film appearances add up to notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-Couldn't find info on her stage appearances. I think the big problem is the article makes it sound like she was mainly in TV/film. (also she has only been in one film and from what I can tell it wasn't a big part). Wgolf (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW-I did go to the rescued archive source and once I did the catcha it went to a "not found" page. Wgolf (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I just noticed it said that she is basically the main character of one of the stage plays she is in-that is what happens when the stage play and the film she is in has nearly the same title and thought it was referring to the film. I might withdraw this if more refs are found. Wgolf (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: can't find any trace of the "Twister Theatre Company" in which she starred, could be local amateur dramatics group. Sorry. PamD 09:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likewise, I couldn't find anything on "Twisted Theatre Company." There is a "Glitter & Twisted Theatre Company" but they've never performed the shows this person's article claims. Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG; IMDb isn't considered notable by itself and that page seems to be the only one in existence that talks about this person. WP:CITINGIMDB (essay), WP:USERGENERATED (content guideline), and WP:RS/IMDB (wikiproject guideline) go into some explanation as to why those citations can't be used to establish notability. Without fully understanding her CV since the archive seems impossible to view, I can almost say with certainty that it was written by herself/her agent and therefore would also not establish notability. Userqio (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately, I can't find anything more about this Emily Jewell either. I am able to access her CV on Spotlight [1] - it's "provided by or on behalf of the member concerned", and is basically an industry listing of actors' details, so confirms that she exists - and actually doesn't give any indication of roles or shows that would add to her notability. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete verification of existence as an actor doesn't mean notable. Graywalls (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 20:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails the WP:GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 02:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.