Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Adams[edit]

I am nominating this for deletion to get a sense of the community's thoughts on this. Colby 18:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. High school and college athletes are not inherently notable. No assertion of notability within the article other than winning a championship — athletes, ideally, win championships. --keepsleeping slack off! 18:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
She's slightly verifiable as an athlete, but yeah, I agree with the above. There are many college athletes in the world, few of them are encyclopedic. Friday (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Who are the USC "Torgans"? And if she's in college, how is she in her senior year at a prep school? Anyway, not notable by prep/college (whichever she is) athlete standards. --Kinu 07:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that too. However the bio link appears legit, so I think the article is just sloppy, not a hoax. Friday (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unheard of. Stifle 01:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I was asked for clarification of this vote by Friday. To clarify, I mean that the article is almost unverifiable and the athlete does not seem to meet the WP:BIO standards. Stifle 17:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.