Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emile Riachi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by G7 (outside of this discussion)

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination). When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

Emile Riachi[edit]

Bio for non-notable person. Damiens.rf 20:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This AfD was blanked by the page's author. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's just not enough out there. His mention in an article on the saudi aramco site [1] is the only thing that's even close to reliable. Part of me thinks, "maybe if I read arabic I'd be able to find more" but it looks like he doesn't have a page on arabic wikipedia, and there's simply no real assertion to notability deserving of a wikipedia article in the sites linked on the page. Vickser (talk) 02:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- CVomment . wiered goins on here. This user originally voted to delete, then an IP changed the vote to keep and Visker didn't notice or care. The IP could be him I suppose but even so voting on the AFD is the only contribution that the anove account has made. There is also lots of wired vandalism in the page history of this discussion that the closing admin may want to take a look at. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 09:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That is enough, vandalism is very suspect with apparently fake usernames and IPs. I request immediate deletion of this article, I CREATED. I am tired monitoring this thing to see what else is going to happen. Is int there a policy where auser can delete his pages he created?

administrators, please help !

 — Preceding [[Wikipedi

- Some weird stuff is going on. I voted delete, and that's still my vote. An imposter by the name of User:Vikser has been editing my comments. I'd encourage the closing administrator to take a close look at the afd history before counting votes. Vickser (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Being the author of this article, I wish to say that I wanted to contribute to Wikipedia in a topic I know very well, which is Lebanon and skiing in Lebanon. The reason why this article was tagged by Damiens is because it was linked to an article about skiing in Lebanon on which there was an editing conflict. After having successfully deleted it, he is tagging related articles and vandalizing others. I wish Wikipedia will be able one day to identify undercovered vandalism but tracking his activity in july 1 and 2 should help understand what i am talking about. I wish this article is deleted as soon as possible and I suggest you do not accept topics and bios from countries outside U.S. or Europe because obviously there is an issue about young computer freaks assessing notability of foreign people. By the way, yes I tried to blank the page as I thought this would lead to accelerate its deletion. I do not want honorable peoples names being associated with a discussion they dont even know about and their notability questioned by people who dont have enough background and culture to assess it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebprofiler (talk • contribs) 07:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possible merge; Doesn't seem to be enough substantial coverage about the individual, but should be written about in an article for any of the organizations that he is president of (Lebanese Ski Federation, Lebanese Orthaepedic Association, if either are notable.) Marasmusine (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Marasmusine is a nice guy but he knows this is not the issue. Apparently this article was patrolled and Ok'd. Then, becuse of a conflict of editing, Damiens.fr tags all article linked to Skiing in lebanon and vandalize another one on Faraya Mzaar, asking for sources that are actually provided. He wants a source for the height of a peak !(what is funny is that it is mentionned in several of the websites cited). Lebprofiler is wrong. This is not an issue of condescendant racism.It is a vengeance from Damiens.fr. Maybe being a Wikipedia editor make him feel he is God. My suggestion is that he takes some holidays. Now, I suggest that this article is deleted quickly because really this discussion is of no interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabuchodonozor (talk • contribs) 19:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:Damiens.rf started an AfD on Skiing in Lebanon by claiming it was blantant copyright which is not very true because the info in the site http://www.skimzaar.com/faraya-mzaar/ski-resort/history-skiing.asp is of public knowledge. This webpage is all about history. Then he commented that there was a lack of notability, when editors protested the AfD for Copyright issues. Then there was comments that skiing in Lebanon was an notable topic so Damiens.rf claimed that he has issues with reliability of the history part. Check the site and some others by Googling : Ski lebanon History, you will see that all info posted exist in the internet. Mr Damiens.rf you have vandalized articles related to the topic of Skiing in Lebanon and individuals associated with it. I dont know who you are, but I think you are the problem. Is there something personal ?

Let us promptly delete this article and all the others you have tagged for deletion. Anyway, people can find the info about the topic and the related individuals all over the internet, if they need some references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabuchodonozor (talk • contribs) 19:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I ve tried to close the discussion with a delete but apparently and ended up staying there. I want to delete it immediately and I dont know how to do it. I am the author and I dont know if Nabuchodonozor is right (by the way, hi !). SO i am now going to blank page, until it is deleted. So please Damiens.rf or any administrator dont revert it!It is my work, I am free to do what I want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebprofiler (talk • contribs) 19:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If there were any reliable sources, it would have taken 1/10th the effort to cite them that various accounts have put into vandalizing this page, the article, and associated articles and talk pages and harassing the nominator. [2] This leads to the logical conclusion that the subject is not notable and thus should be deleted. Edward321 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am the author of the article, I have tried to delete by closing the discussion and putting the word "delete" (I saw a notice about how to close a discussion)but it did not work. Why cant somebody just close this discussion. The opinion of the author should be enough for deletion. Is it not in the policy?

Meanwhile i wll keep on blanking the page and, sorry, this is not vandalizing when you blank your own work ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebprofiler (talk • contribs) 23:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:Comment Lebprofiler, the Afd tag clearly says 'Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed.' In spite of that specific instruction, you have repeatedly blanked the article, which is vandalism. Edward321 (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:Comment This author should not be edited by anyone other than the author until it is delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebprofiler (talk • contribs) 17:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.