Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Sax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator (me). (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emil Sax[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a minor economist. Couple of minor hits on News, Highbeam, JSTOR, and Books; he did publish some books, but with very low citation counts (highest was 132). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - further research by Sam Sailor shows the notability. I simply muffed this one, it appears. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep. Don't be fooled by this unsourced stub, have a look at the well-sourced article at cs:Emil Sax: he held a full professorship at the Charles University in Prague, and after it was split in 1882, he first became Dean of the Law College/Faculty (?) and later Rector for the German Charles-Ferdinand University. As Rector he was also de:Virilist ex-officio of the de:Böhmischer Landtag. 1879-85 he was an elected member of the Imperial Council (Austria). Pinging @Onel5969: for their reconsideration. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I added five English-language {{cite book}}s, they are all from the first page of the mandatory Google Book search. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 03:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.