Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil 'Pup' Pupulidy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emil 'Pup' Pupulidy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

alternative (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not entirely sure if he's fully notable or if this article can be improved and the best results I found was this which includes some good sources such as an Autoweek 1958 newspaper. This has been here since August 2005 and there's no move target. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I moved the article to Emanuel Pupulidy. Kraxler (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'd imagine there's tons of stuff on him in newspapers & books, Seeing as this is pre 90's I doubt there's much info on him online, So all in all I'd say it's best to just Keep & Improve. –Davey2010^Talk 01:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are lots of sources out there, like this. But his name was actually Emanuel Pupulidy and he was born in 1918. Kraxler (talk) 00:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the article, deleted the OR, and added sources to what could be established as fact. Kraxler (talk) 02:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep due to the sources/revisions provided by Kraxler. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 02:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.