Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emeka Okonkwo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 05:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emeka Okonkwo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep entry already contains several citations to very substantial coverage of this individual. Not sure what the problem is. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Very simply put, I fail to find these "references" in-depth or non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opatachibueze (talk) 08:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Me too, I was starting to take an offence but I am trying hard to understand what reddogsix wants. What do you need for the references to be in-depth or non-trivial. Most entertainment celebrities in Nigeria only appear in blogs.

Delete the souces are not indepth nor substantial.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Let's be realistic here. Pulse is an established news and media agency in Nigeria. InformationNG is among the top Nigeria news sources and is listed as one of the top visited sites in Nigeria. We all know that we are talking about the youngest billionaire in Nigeria. So why is the question not how to solve the problem but whether the article should be deleted. Opatachibueze (talk) 08:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I took another look at the page, I accept there were some shabby statements by me and mistakes (I am yet to get used to visual editing) so copy and paste made me miss some information. I've scrutinized the page and added more information where necessary. @reddogsix and @Johnpacklambert can you recheck and let me know your thoughts. Opatachibueze (talk) 08:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.