Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Vilnius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ all to their respective United States-X articles. If anyone wishes to merge any content, they can from the history behind the redirect, but I note AirshipJungleman29's comment which believes there isn't much (if anything) to merge. Daniel (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of the United States, Vilnius[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the articles say nothing about the embassies, and as articles already exist covering bilateral relations, these should be deleted. Biruitorul ^Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Morocco, Mongolia, Lithuania, North Macedonia, Costa Rica, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: These pages mention the circumstances around the founding of the embassies, as well as basic information such as pictures and addresses (distinct from bilateral relations) – Kjerish (talk) 20:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- We are not a directory, for one. For another, we need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Finally, “circumstances around the founding of the embassies” pertain to bilateral relations, not to the commissioning and execution of the embassy building projects. — Biruitorul ^Talk 21:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to their respective bilateral relations per WP:NOPAGE. None of these have enough content to stand on their own. Sgubaldo (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all content fork of bilateral relations. LibStar (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete would suggest merging per WP:NOPAGE, but I don't see anything worthy to be merged. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect/merge with Mongolia–United States relations - not much to merge but the mention of Denver Street and Steven Mann as the first resident official would be useful in the relations article. --chinneeb-talk 02:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Embassy of the United States, Skopje. No comment with respect to the others. The redirect was fine in my opinion, and it should be restored if this is closes as delete. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge all to respective United States–X articles. I don't get why you would make an article about an embassy but then write little to nothing about the embassy and instead write about the history of their diplomacy. There's already an article for that, as well as for the list of ambassadors. Those articles can also mention something about the establishment of the embassy when there's not enough sourcing on the building itself. Reywas92^Talk 14:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.