Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emanuela Rei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is a clear absence of consensus to delete, after extended time for discussion. However, sourcing should be improved, or we'll be right back here in another few months. BD2412 T 20:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emanuela Rei[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. Antila333 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Antila333 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – There needs to be evidence that she's gotten enough coverage to meet WP:BASIC. (I think she probably technically meets WP:NACTOR due to being a co-lead on Maggie & Bianca: Fashion Friends, and for being in the cast of TV series previous to that, but meeting WP:BASIC/WP:GNG is actually the metric that matters for WP:BLPs.) Right now, the article is entirely unsourced and is basically a WP:BLPPROD case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence she is a notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She meets WP:NACTOR with her main role in Maggie & Bianca, and she has gotten coverage in Italian papers: ANSA, Note, la Repubblica. (There are also a lot of news articles to source her other roles like this that don't go in-depth as those.) Unfortunately the article was created without any sourcing and poor translations. TheFallenPower (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: WP:ENT is definitely made out, in my opinion. Aside from her role in Maggie & Bianca: Fashion Friends, the subject has had significant recurring roles in a number of other Italian shows. (Claiming that WP:GNG was not made out would have been a better reason for nomination, I think—but sources have been identified above.) Dflaw4 (talk) 12:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have now fixed the translation issues. The page is basically a mirror image of the Italian page. The sources identified here and the sources in the Italian article can be added. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article has no sources at all, which means we cannot keep it under BLP rules. It would not even survive a prod which could be passed by just putting on some sub-standard source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I put on sources that I mentioned earlier. TheFallenPower (talk) 15:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: subject has at least one major role and continues to be notable through recurring roles. Has more coverage in Italian press than internationally. I think that still makes her relevent to English wikipedia.Grmike (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)grmike[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.