Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvin Juarez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elvin Juarez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded BLP on an American YouTube personality with his Youtube channel as the only "reference"; currently it has under 2000 views in total. Fails WP:BIO. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of any notability.TheLongTone (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Easily fails WP:ENT and WP:NOTABILITY. No WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 17:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sourcing to the videos that are alleged to have brought him notice is primary sourcing and will not work for notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the others have pointed out, no RS coverage, fails GNG. If every youtube channel with 2000+ views had a page.....Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.