Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elva Trill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elva Trill[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Rejected at Afc and moved to mainspace. Bitpart actor, lots of single episodes. Nothing mainstream. scope_creep^Talk 17:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Whoever proposed article for deletion didn't read the sources. All three initial sources are reliable. I added 3 more. I don't know what Evoke is, is it like the Irish version of People or Us Weekly magazines?--Filmomusico (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. While the article likely shouldn't have been moved to mainspace over AfC, and the tone and sourcing more than a little off (first names, promotional and editorial flourishes, celeb magazine fluff about eating pasta, etc), there do appear to be a number of independent reliable sources which cover the subject in some depth and as a primary topic. Indicating that WP:GNG may be met. Guliolopez (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We can go through the reference. The basic of this never turned up much at all. She was born in 1993 so is firmly in the modern era, and if there was deep, independent, secondary sources available, they would have been immediately visible, but they weren't. scope_creep^Talk 16:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Correction, according to the first reference, she is 28 years old. It doesn't firmly say what year she was born in, let alone a month. As for visibility, what did you expect, The New York Times? She is an Irish actress, so The Irish Times and Entertainment.ie are as close as we can get here.--Filmomusico (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there are enough references for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.