Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elso[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks all notability [1][2], would be a speedy candidate if we could speedy delete films... Fram (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 11:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. With the above, the one and only source is directly from the movie's creators. Tirishan (talk) 15:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as it seems like a fluff piece. Also, random comment: it seems like that page is a magnet for vandals/test edits. I wonder why? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 02:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with notability issues. Also, unsubmitted draft at Draft:ELSO Short Film should be dusted off and approved when notability is sufficient. Inomyabcs (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFILM. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm unable to find coverage of any sort about this short film. Pichpich (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.