Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloisa Marchesoni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eloisa Marchesoni[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. None of the cited sources constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Most are passing mentions or quotations from Marchesoni in articles about other topics, or articles by Marchesoni herself. The exceptions are either interviews with Marchesoni without secondary commentary or analysis (non-independent), or self-published (non-reliable), or both. Jfire (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jfire (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Cryptocurrency, Business, and Technology. Skynxnex (talk) 17:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - puffery, non-RSes and crypto spam - David Gerard (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per my original PROD — thanks. Meszzy² (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete More crypto fluff. "Tokenomics" should really have a link to another article, otherwise this whole article falls flat; what the heck is that? Expert at age 26, with zero mentions in any kind of RS. Oaktree b (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and the image is likely a copyvio from her personal website. Try harder next time guys, this is getting easy to spot now. Oaktree b (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, references are a bunch of interviews with her, quotes from her and other passing mentions. Nothing substantial ABOUT her, and searches don't find anything significantly better. Just fluff and self-promotion, as many things crypto tend to be, sadly. Neiltonks (talk) 10:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Absolutely nothing there to indicate any kind of notability. Promotional fluff. Lard Almighty (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article that suffers from WP:BOMBARDMENT. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Devoke water 10:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.