Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elnik Systems

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elnik Systems[edit]

Elnik Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are some sources in the article (such as this one) and I did find this one in a Google search, but all of these articles appear to be generic coverage in trade publications. Does this article meet the WP:NCORP? I'd be happy to be convinced otherwise, but this is a small company with 40 employees. Alansohn (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Alansohn (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Alansohn (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Three of the sources given are deadlinks. This one[1] is an interview with company's president, fails WP:ORGIND.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am not finding anything that makes this company notable. Jeepday (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. Not enough to meet notability guidelines. Habiliment (talk) 11:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.