Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellapaige

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 18:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ellapaige[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon it looks like. I think she will have a page someday-but not today. This also seems like a fan's POV not a neutral. Wgolf (talk) 01:13, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've pretty much removed all of the unsourced, promotional content since it was so non-neutral that she could've been speedied for that alone. There is an assertion of notability here through her association with Bieber so we should have a more thorough discussion, just so we have an official consensus. That said, I couldn't really find anything that talked about the singer apart from her relationship with Bieber. Some mention is to be expected, but I couldn't really find enough out there to show a true depth of coverage about the singer herself. Everything was about her maybe dating Bieber, about salacious rumors of her sleeping with him, and about the cyberbullying she received as a result of hanging out with him. None of the articles really focused on her career at all- it was all about her in relation to Bieber. Since her relationship wasn't well-known enough to really warrant a mention in Bieber's article, I'll just vote to delete. If anyone wants to userfy/incubate this I have no true objection, just that at this point in time it's just WP:TOOSOON. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 01:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.