Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Tyrrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to James Ussher. Courcelles 19:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Tyrrell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't see how she is notable. Seems like she's only notable because her father is. Can't find her anywhere on Google either. Yields very few search results. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to James Ussher. It could be merged either to husband Timothy Tyrrell (whose notability is questionable) or much more famous father James Ussher, though her sons James Tyrrell (Oakley)[1] and John Tyrrell (Royal Navy officer) are also notable. Of those, son is less logical than father, and husband may not be notable. Can find no reason why she might be notable in herself. There are published letters by a different Elizabeth Ussher (c. 1772-96).[2] There is some info about this Elizabeth online but mainly just on her family and relation with her father[3][4][5][6][7]. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to her husband Timothy Tyrrell. He and her two sons are all on the fringes of notability. She seems to have done nothing but be a mother and wife. Clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - no doubt she existed, but she's not really that notable. A merger is cheap and easy here. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.