Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Snyder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Snyder[edit]

Nomination for deletion Fails WP:BIO Resume-spam for daytime soap writer. Two-time Daytime Emmy and Writers Guild of America Award nominee. Bwithh 05:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Two-time Daytime Emmy nominee sounds good enough for me. - crz crztalk 05:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, that is notable! Expand/Stub perhaps? Missvain 05:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Daytime Emmy nominations prove notability. Needs wikification though. Crystallina 05:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:yrgh 19 Nov. 06: DON'T DELETE: Snyder has been writing on soaps since the late 80s; almost 20 years now. This is NOT spam as suggested by another user. Snyder IS notable! Her current position is on B&B, a show seen by at least 6.4 million adults in North America! (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Keep contra to nom. --Dennisthe2 08:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Utterly fails WP:BIO. Nominations don't grant notability. Further, having no WP:RS writing about her, there can be no WP:V and this will never be more than a resume. Valrith 16:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Head writer on multiple very popular television soap operas, in addition to two Emmy nominations. --Oakshade 16:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems notable in her field though the article is a stub. User:Dimadick
Weak keep although better sources seem hard to find. Probably write-ups in offline soap-culture magazines, though. --Dhartung | Talk 21:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Valrith. Mere Nominations do nothing for notability; only wins do. And I'm not sure she'd pass WP:BIO even if she'd won. --Aaron 21:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite. Her nominations make her notable enough for mine but it reads like a CV at the moment. Capitalistroadster 02:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notableXpendersx 20:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re-write. As written now, looks like a resumé. 38.100.34.2 00:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.