Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Kandel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Kandel[edit]

Elizabeth Kandel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Loads of sources, but nothing that seems substantial enough; they are either mentions in articles about something else or routine directory entries. TheLongTone (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- "director of marketing" is rarely a notable position, and this subject misses the mark. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No convincing claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 22:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not notable; reads like a personal promotion piece or CV. Kierzek (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. she's not notable. Jobscomforter (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.