Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Hamilton Guarino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR Close‎. Any established editor is welcome to bring this back to AfD if there's merit. Star Mississippi 02:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Hamilton Guarino[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author, fails WP:NAUTHOR. Fhektii (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As reviewer noted, the author fails WP:NAUTHOR. Books the author has created are not well-known and are not significant, have brought about major changes in any way.

Antny08 (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Iowa. Shellwood (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See [1]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~WP:G5 doesn't apply as checkuser hasn't connected them to any master yet. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

As I have said in all the other places you have pasted this comment, G5 is irrelevant. That is a speedy deletion criterion - the opposite of what I am suggesting.

Weak delete. There is some coverage in local press like [2], [3], [4]. If someone here can find book reviews of her books then consider my !vote as keep. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — 84.146.2.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.