Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Fiske

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Fiske[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined an A7 as there are sources. However, having had a quick look, it seems this person is only documented as leaving a brief comment about the state of the Democrat candidates in the 2016 election as a sophomore student. Can't find anything else. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As far as I can see this college student is completely unnotable, merely having been asked, as a member of the student community, for her view of candidates before the 2016 US presidential election. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability. Appearing once on cable TV is nowhere close to sufficient. Power~enwiki (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Power~enwiki. - GretLomborg (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable. No in-depth coverage about her. Current sources are just reliable sources interviewing undecided voters (one of whom happens to be her) about the 2016 election. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nominator, subject lacks sufficient coverage and fails WP:GNG Cllgbksr (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NikolaiHo^☎️ 02:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.