Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Englander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Englander[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been tagged for notability for 9 years. Autobiography; I don't think it meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A GS h-index of only 10 is inadequate for the highly cited field of pop-psychology: WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Weak delete. She has one highly cited work, Understanding Violence (review), and her research on bullying and 'sexting' has attracted some media coverage [1][2][3][4]. But I think it's borderline whether that meets the threshold of WP:PROF or the WP:GNG, and given that it's an autobiography that has had unresolved issues for years, I'm leaning towards delete. Maybe someone can have another stab at it in a few years. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations not high enough for WP:PROF#C1 and the article makes no case for any other notability criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.