Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Dinh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Dinh[edit]

Elizabeth Dinh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a local TV journalist with no secondary coverage to indicate notability. MB 21:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this news anchor is not the subject of any reliable secondary sources' articles. There is nothing notable about her. ArchieOof (talk) 00:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable local market TV journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the awards listed don't meet any exceptions to WP:GNG Burroughs'10 (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and others. Citobun (talk) 10:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.