Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliza Patterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete An article whose sole source is the personal homepage of the creator, who has precisely one edit: creating this page. If it's not a hoax then it's an unverifiable negative article with no independent reliable sources. It's been here since 2006, well done whoever found it by that's a very long time! Guy (Help!) 13:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Eliza Patterson[edit]
- Eliza Patterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no claim for notability other than the mere presumption (without any serious evidence) that this person caused a weed infestation.
Even if the weed claim can be established (which seems very doubtful to me) then a merge and redirect to the article would be better than a stand-alone article. Mattinbgn (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with Mattinbgn. Note the redirect page Eliza Grace Patterson should also be deleted. Adpete (talk) 07:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - also agree with nom. As another note, the page Patterson's Curse gives the introducer (if that's a word) as Jane Patterson, so the whole article is completely unverified. Frickeg (talk) 08:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.