Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite Seven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elite Seven[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Good faith nomination on behalf of IP user; nomination rationale copied from talk page:

I nominate this page for deletion as I cannot find any third party source or reference that mentions it. It seems like a peacock article that has no encyclopaedic value.123.211.253.49 (talk) 09:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am neutral. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nomination for deletion. I also cannot find any third party sources that refer to the "elite seven". I don't think this belongs on wiki - its just a conceit.Nuffynuffy (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:V. I can't find any evidence that this term is used, apart from a number of Wikipedia mirrors. Pburka (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete something like this would need some really rock-solid sourcing, and not only doesn't it have that, it doesn't have any sourcing whatsoever. So... it's gotta go. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I found one non-Wiki use of the term Elite Seven here: [1] (near the bottom), just to be helpful. Don't know if that makes it notable, but seems to exist as a phrase, maybe not as a body with a committee etc. Sussexonian (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As non-notable expression. But there should be an article on South African private schools. Kitfoxxe (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.