Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to White Pony. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elite (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My notability tag has been disputed a few times now, so I guess I'll take my issues here. While the song does pass WP:NSONG criteria #2 for winning a Grammy, it seems to suffer from WP:PERMASTUB. As WP:NSONG notes, "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Since the song wasn't released as a single, nor was it promoted in anyway, I don't believe the article could grow much beyond what it is now. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 22. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge It's a weird case because despite winning a Grammy it was never released as a single[1]. Hence sources will be album reviews[2]. A merge/redirect to White Pony is called for by WP:NSONG unless anyone can find better sources. (As an aside, a lot of things win Grammies every year due to their numerous categories, but not all of them really get much mainstream press, so even if it's a well-known artist, winning a genre Grammy is not itself a guarantee of notability - NSONG says it's only an indicator not a guarantee.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - The fact that it won a Grammy does mean it has been noted by peers. I'd say that the song is indeed notable. But in this case, winning a Grammy didn't really generate the sort of coverage for the song that would provide is the material to flesh out the article so a merge is more appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- Notable due to Grammy but not enough coverage for a stand alone article. Merge with White Pony album.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.