Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elii Geba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elii Geba[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically open and shut for an article with a certainly unacceptable current version and my searches found nothing better than these links (hardly useful for a better article) and this has basically stayed the same since May 2006. Pinging tagger Mike Rosoft who also said "Marked as a stub - possible deletion candidate". SwisterTwister talk 23:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is an eternal stub with no references except for her website - 9 years with no improvement. She does have an entry on AllMusic, but it only lists a single album published at ACM Productions (which appears to be a two-man "film and video production company" - unless the Google search returns a different company of the same name), and a couple of appearances on compilation albums. I don't think she meets the inclusion guidelines, so I'm afraid it's a delete from me. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete same as above Rainbow unicorn (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly as nothing to show they pass notability criteria could be found on search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.