Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli et Papillon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per no participation herein other than from the nominator.) North America1000 03:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eli et Papillon[edit]

Eli et Papillon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. This basically just asserts that they exist, the end, and sources it to one piece of reliable source coverage and one interview on a blog -- but the interview doesn't assist notability, because it represents the band talking about themselves, and the one piece of real reliable source coverage isn't enough by itself to give them "notability because media coverage exists" in the absence of actually having accomplished any specific thing that would pass NMUSIC. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.