Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephant Larry (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Elephant Larry

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Elephant Larry
• Articles for deletion/Elephant Larry (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Elephant Larry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable performing group; Mentions and quotes exist in online press but lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GROUP//WP:GNG. Previous AFD (in 2006) resulted in keep citing Google hits and listings on their now-defunct website. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and New York. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Delete Looking through the news hits from above and there are 2 mentions, both just in passing. In the previous discussion (which could drive in most states) somebody mentioned that there were 57000 google hits, but I don't see anything that is specific and in depth enough to be used as a source. Rockphed (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

• Delete I found that the group has won an ECNY Award for Best Comedy Group [1] and has been reviewed by the Charleston City Paper and the New York Times, but this still fails WP:ENT. Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.