Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Krutko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Krutko[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar case to Evangelina Olivarez. Does not meet WP:NTENNIS as has never played in or won a tournament that would grant automatic notability (please note that Fed Cup no longer counts). WP:GNG does not appear to be met since only stats coverage seems to be available. Nothing in Google News or ProQuest or a Latvian source search. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Latvia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NTENNIS Bonoahx (talk) 15:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes Wikiproject Tennis Guideline. Has participated in a major international tournament for her nation in Fed Cup. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, the essay at Wikiproject Tennis cannot be used to support keeping an article that fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 09:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Notability is clearly superseded by NTENNIS as the former even says This section contains an essay on notability, consisting of the advice and/or opinions of one or more WikiProjects on how notability may be interpreted within their area of interest. This information is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 09:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. Fails the Sports SNG. No reason to keep based on an essay that does not have consensus to make it binding guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.