Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Fernández (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Fernández[edit]

Elena Fernández (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to credibly establish WP:NBIO in its current state. Completely unsourced, other than official website and IMDB. Murph9000 (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Murph9000 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per lack of good sourcing, and this currently reads like a promo piece Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of reliable sources is especially problematic for BLPs, which essentially require an abundance of reliable, in-depth, third-party sources. Additionally, it seems that someone claiming to be the subject of the article has been requesting that we remove her date of birth from the article, apparently because of age discrimination in her industry, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a professional casting database; the best solution, if this actress's biography cannot be reliably sourced, is not to selectively cut out encyclopedic information -- it's to delete the article. Hijiri 88 (やや) 10:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.