Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics Technician distance education program (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Electronics Technician distance education program[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overly promotional and no good sources available Cutlass ^Ciera 20:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete is what I would support. The whole article feels like a promotion. If this discussion results in a "keep", at least make the article conform to WP:NPOV. Wizzito (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is nothing to indicate the program is notable or has been recognized outside of narrow industry publications. The article has been glued together from low quality publications, rather than SIGCOV in independent pubs. GNG fail. --- Possibly (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.