Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Immortality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. IRWolfie- (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic Immortality[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a concept developed by Alexander Bolonkin since 1991. Bolonkin himself might be notable for various reasons (he's done a lot). However I can't verify this particular concept is notable on its own. The sourcing is mostly primary (self-published, interviews, articles by Bolonkin) including searching *.ru -- the "in widely press" section lists some sources but I can't verify some of the publications ever existed .. there's a newspaper interestingly named "Interesting Newspaper" and one to-the-point named "News". Bolkin currently has a Kickstarter Project active on this topic with a few days remaining. It might be WP:FRINGE as well. Green Cardamom (talk) 06:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete This is the exact same article material as was deleted here 8 years ago: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Electronic_immortality (a copy of the text is here: [1]). IRWolfie- (talk) 19:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and delete Merge some of it with Digital Immortality and then delete it. Both describe the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RicardAnufriev (talk • contribs) 00:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.