Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric City Shock SC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomiator withdrawn. Fenix down (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Electric City Shock SC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. No indication the team has played for the national cup. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - teams playing in 4th tier of US soccer have long been considered notable. Giant Snowman 10:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It may be a young football club, but as GSnowman pointed out they play in the 4th tier. Govvy (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable topic, play in a notable league, plausible term. Quidster4040 (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - teams at this level are gneerally considered notable. Smartyllama (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn but once again, fourth division in North America is not as notable as it is in the UK. This team has no coverage and so we're deleting other articles because it does not meet GNG but we keep association football articles because of a faulty criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.