Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elddis Transport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elddis Transport[edit]

Elddis Transport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A user, Devokewater (talk · contribs), raised a concern at WP:RFD that this company doesn't seem to be notable. It may contain puffery or POV, but I do note that all the sources are primary or PR. I have not attempted WP:BEFORE myself, on assumption that Devokewater has already done so. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I was surprised that Elddis was accepted by a new page reviewer. When I first came across the article it had no substance or any sources. I've tried adding sources but with no effect. Although due to its history (Siidle C Cook) it’s a well-respected company in its industry, however for Wikipedia its non-notable. --Devokewater (talk) 08:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Devokewater; this was created in 2006, long before NPR even existed. Nightfury 13:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think this company could be considered notable. A google search shows a news report from just 3 hours ago and there seems to be quite a few independent sources referring to them. Although this article does require a lot of work. PlunketMcShane (talk) 12:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Run of the mill, not notable. I can think of much larger haulage companies that don't have any articles here. Nightfury 13:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 05:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indications of notability, Wikipedia isn't a yellow pages or a platform for promotion. I cannot locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP HighKing++ 21:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but rename to Elddis (caravan manufacturer) which is more notable and has had articles published by sources such as Outandaboutlive, PracticalMotorhome etc. The caravan/motorhome manufacturer is more notable, this should be a redirect, at best. Chelston-temp-1 (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if Elddis (caravan manufacturer) is deemed to be notable it needs its own independent article, this is a road haulage company a separate business.Devokewater @ 11:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. The entry consists of few facts based on self-published soures, press-releases and mentions in passing. WP:CORPSPAM, WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.