Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El grumpo lumpo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (criteria: A7) (non-admin closure). Linguist ^talk|contribs 19:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El grumpo lumpo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is incomprehensible. Is it about a game, a person, a fictional person, or what?

If someone wants to nominate this as patent nonsense, I will concur. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly speedily – I found 3 results: one from a wiki and two results from Roblox. I don't think G1 applies, as it isn't entirely incomprehensible. I think A7 could apply, however. Linguist ^talk|contribs 16:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: The article was previously created by the same user and speedied less than an hour ago (see filter log and deletion log). Linguist ^talk|contribs 16:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If a page is deleted repeatedly, it is sometimes good to let XFD run, both so that G4 applies in the future, and to provide a better basis for salt. If anyone wants to speedy this, I don't object. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - As to comprehensibility, any one sentence is comprehensible. As a whole, it isn't. Speedy deletion is for clear cases, and the only thing clear is that we should delete this. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a WP:COAT article. It also is has no references making it possible that it contains WP:OR and should be deleted. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 22:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.