Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekojoe Marvé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ekojoe Marvé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD (as an unsourced BLP) was removed claiming that sources were there, but I see no citations or references (just two external links to unacceptable sources of the subject's own website and his Facebook page) Page exists only to promote subject's brand new clothing line (founded in 2017!) with two (against rules) in-line outside links to the clothing website. When I do a Google search for the subject's name, next to nothing comes up, other than hits for his social media profiles. Mabalu (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - shameless & transparent vanity page for an exceptionably non-notable person. No refs. No info. No significant following. Rayman60 (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is all self sourced. I can find no RS with anything on this subject. Fails notability. Gab4gab (talk) 03:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete nothing notable about the subject —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLP PROD was incorrectly removed. The article had no references (key word) at the time it was nominated, just external links - which definitely aren't the same thing. Never mind - fails the GNG. Delete it with fire. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Exemplo347: I think you'll find that WP:BLPPROD says they are the same thing, nor do they have to be reliable. Adam9007 (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - It also says "the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article" but I suppose you stopped reading before that. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - And it also says "To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise)". Adam9007 (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.