Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekmel Ozbay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ekmel Ozbay[edit]

Only outside link is this person's curriculum vitae. He has won some awards and might be notable enough, but i'm not sure. Yamanbaiia 18:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep on notability alone. Borderline case. That the article is an obvious COI does not justify deletion: it only hinders (and, in this case, totally prevents) the article's promotion on the quality scale (that is Good Articles, Featured Articles). --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 22:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google Scholar shows that he has had plenty of well-cited publications to make him notable by WP:PROF. Phil Bridger 15:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —Phil Bridger 15:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: plenty publications, an invited review in Science, director of a large research institute, well-cited. I have cleaned the article a bit, but it needs some more work and sourcing. --Crusio 16:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger and Crusio. Tim Ross·^talk 17:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I fleshed out & verified one of the more major award pages that he's won; that's for real. --Lquilter 18:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.