Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Korbut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ekaterina Korbut[edit]

Ekaterina Korbut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. ColonelHenry (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. Why is this nominated for deletion? MrsHudson (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep She was listed in Wikiproject Chess's most wanted articles before it was created. PatGallacher (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Certainly notable within the context of the chess world. Not many women hold the full International Master title. MaxBrowne (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per all arguments given above. Cobblet (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some very distinguished achievements. Brittle heaven (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As a non-chess person, I (never-the-less) find this person of interest. I also hope her activities can be updated in the article. What has she done since 2008? Kdammers (talk) 04:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.