Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisenstein in Guanajuato
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Incubate. This article is surely a decent one, however its surely too early as the filming has not even started. The developing article can be seen here. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 05:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Eisenstein in Guanajuato[edit]
- Eisenstein in Guanajuato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod denied. Film is in pre-production and has not received significant coverage. WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 19:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy or incubate. The article itself is actually pretty decent, especially given the not inconsiderable handicap of having as its subject a film that has not yet been filmed. A web search does return plenty of mentions, but I didn't see anything WP:RS and substantial. Given Greenaway's track record, if and when the picture sees the light of day, I assume that it will easily achieve notability. Please bring this article back then. WP is not a not a WP:CRYSTALBALL and is not for WP:PROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate or Userfy. Good option. With principle photography slated to begin in 2 months, and in considering the growing level of coverage in its anticipation, this one can be welcomed back once NFF is met. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate or Userify as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.