Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein (novel)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. It may be worth a redirect to author. Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Miles Gibson per nom. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deletre Not even worth a redirect, since Worldcat shows it isn essentially no libraries. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.