Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eggy Peggy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eggy Peggy[edit]
- Eggy Peggy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable recipe with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Contested PROD. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NOTHOWTO. Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki the recipe part (not the language game part) to Wikibooks, which has a collection of recipes. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and oppose transwiki. The recipe portion appears to be cribbed from the internet. See this blog post. -- Whpq (talk) 16:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Whpq and nom Dusti*Let's talk!* 06:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.