Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eggology (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eggology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a company, it doesn't appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. As a brand/product, it exists, has some use in a few cookery books, etc, but appears to lack significant coverage. The brand was bought out by Pearl Valley Farms in 2015, and a redirect and encapsulation there might theoretically be an option, but PVF doesn't meet CORPDEPTH either. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear advertising and literally everything emphasizes it hence not notable and WP:NOT policy also applies. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete -- fails to establish notability & this content belongs on the company web site anyway. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.