Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efficient grease

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Clearly a non-notable neologism that would be better suited as an idea incorporated into the Bribery or a related Corruption article. Sources would probably support that kind of inclusion if introduced properly. Mike Cline (talk) 17:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Efficient grease[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. Google hits. Only the first page has results about this use of "efficient grease". Everything else is about machines. mboverload @ 23:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've improved the references now, and hope to continue to do so.Andrewjlockley (talk) 00:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a mainstream or notable theory. The sources, of questionable reliability, all cite the same person, one P.G. Méon, who with his partner L. Weill seems to be the sole propounder of this theory, citing the same research over and over. The first two sources in the article cite them. The third source cited argues that the hypothesis is false. Everything I can find on Google is about them. Google Scholar finds only Méon and various co-authors, with some citations but not an impressive number. Could be redirected or merged to Political corruption. --MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per MelanieN. Non-notable neo. --j⚛e decker ^talk 20:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Even if (and that's a big IF) this term gains popular acceptance, it still doesn't need an article but a redirect to bribery or Political corruption would be sufficient, as per MelanieN. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't feel it meets WP:N. Swarm^Talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.