Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effectrode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Effectrode[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has not received significant coverage in third-party sources. Major references are either written by the subject, or are reviews from magazines which review thousands of products. Having a review in a guitar magazine does not entitle one to a WP article. No especially famous bands have used these effects. Looking at the history of the article, it has been written and edited almost entirely by user:Moogolplex, whose contributions have been almost all on this article. This makes it seem likely that the owner of this company is Moogolplex. Conical Johnson (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Despite long terms warnings the article still reads like technobabble and commercial puff. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORP and no amount of puffery by the WP:SPA author changes that. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.