Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effect of Molecular Biology on human health
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 04:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Effect of Molecular Biology on human health[edit]
- Effect of Molecular Biology on human health (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This page is weird... It looks like OR but at the same time is sourced, so I don't know what to do with it. Will (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, complete OR. Evidence does not support claims. JFW | T@lk 13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because this is not an encyclopedic article. Pavel Vozenilek 14:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research, irrelevant sources and poor formatting. Kariteh 16:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dont Delete Good idea, could help, needs wiki page, but needs some initial editing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yash Vaidya (talk • contribs) 16:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please remember that WP:ILIKEIT and WP:USEFUL are not relevant in deletion debates. Kariteh 16:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for completely missing its subject. Has lots of Nature articles about molecular biology, but virtually nothing about the effect on human health. And Wikipedia sure is not an index of Nature articles. --Huon 22:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete about as unencyclopedic as an article can get. Incomplete OR, based on a very superficial understanding.DGG 04:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. As the article is designed currently, it appears to solicit OR and opinions from editors! At best, this will end up just a content fork of molecular biology. At worst, we wind up with POV pushing. I don't see the need to let this article continue. —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is not an encyclopedia article, and is also almost content free. The subject itself could have been in principle a section in another article, but as this article stands, it says almost nothing about anything.Dan Gluck 14:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This will be an encyclopaedic article, using the power of wiki to create it! The Effect of People paragraphs are neither OR, nor POV. They will be the results of clinical trials that have proven the benefit of the molecular biology paper to humanity with proper referencing. Any one sided POV will be challenged and edited (as usual) on the wiki!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.53.45 (talk • contribs)
- Delete as an original essay. Someguy1221 21:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete seems a good faith effort, but this is not an encyclopedia article. It should be built on a different wiki system. Debivort 06:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.