Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward H. Clarke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing nomination, with apologies - I didn't find the book reviews and the additional information found by other contributors to this discussion. Thank you for your work. (non-admin closure) Hugsyrup (talk) 12:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edward H. Clarke[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed with the following explanation, which still holds true: A summary of an interesting but, as far as I can see, non-notable career. I can find almost no sources beyond a brief obituary which, despite being in the very WP:RS Washington Post, actually appears to have been written and placed by family or friends. Otherwise, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO etc.

Prod endorsed by TonyTheTiger

Prod removed by Andrew Davidson (no explanation provided) Hugsyrup (talk) 08:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject's work in economics is influential, being associated with multiple Nobel prizes. There is now an extensive literature on the VCG mechanism and the subject here is the C. See Microeconomics; Game Theory and Mechanism Design; Mechanism Design Theory; Princeton. So, this passes WP:ANYBIO, "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". Andrew D. (talk) 09:38, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:51, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I note that Google Scholar says that the subject's paper "Multipart pricing of public goods", of which he is the sole author, has been cited 3650 times. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I improved the sourcing, including finding multiple reviews of his book and a scholarly obituary that confirms that he was shortlisted for the Nobel. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.