Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Fyfe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Fyfe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any secondary reliable sources that give more than trivial coverage of the subject, failing WP:N and WP:BIO. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I searched Google News archives for Fyfe and his company [1]and found one article from 1994 from the Wichita Eagle. Sorry, and I do mean sorry, but that is just not sufficient to allow this article under WP:BIO. Mr. Fyfe appears to be a prominent businessman and an accomplished person, and it's a shame but Wiki guidelines don't seem to allow an article on him, when there are articles on so much absolute trivia. This is not a trivial person by any means. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 05:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I encountered this web page trying to understand the Tyfo product created by Fyfe Co LLC. Rather than entirely delete the entire article, reference to Fyfe Co LLC should be retained. This product is being used for construction at our site. We are also understanding that the Tyfo products are very low VOC, at least the epoxies and A-B components. The article references to such a company are valid as I have just personally discussed the product with Ed Fyfe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.45.72.26 (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to sign on to show who wrote the above Para. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammers046 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately, possibly due to the nature of the company and the man in question, I don't think there will ever be enough sources to prove notability or make the article verifiable. There certainly aren't enough now. Even if we agree that we would like for this article to stay, there isn't a place for it in Wikipedia. Annalise (talk) 05:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.