Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edultery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edultery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unencyclopedic content - WP:DICTIONARY. Happy Editing! — 72.75.57.223 (talk · contribs) _{17:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)}[reply]
Strong Delete - Obvious breach of WP:DICTIONARY and WP:NEO. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete checked references, do not mention this wordCurb Chain (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It is listed in Mirriam-Webster's dictionary, but it fails WP:NEO. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:04, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the place to promote a neologism. Cullen328 (talk) 18:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obvious close.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 01:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.